Polsinelli Shughart PC
Construction Litigation Attorneys

James E. Bird
Practice Area Chair

Sherry K. Dreisewerd
Justin K. Edelson
David D. Ferguson
Daniel J. Flanigan
Howard B. Gelt
John J. Hebert
Shanti M. Katona
Monika J. Machen
Mary B. Martin
Jason A. Nagi
Andrew J. Nazar
Thomas J. O'Neal
Wesley D. Ray
Amy W. Ringsdorf
Mark W. Roth
Philip R. Rudd
Jean Soh
Terrance M. Summers
Jerry L. Switzer Jr.
John M. Tyner
Christopher A. Ward


To learn more about our Bankruptcy and Financial Restructuring
group or to see a
complete list of our
attorneys, click here

 

 

www.polsinelli.com

 

 

October 2010
   

Bankruptcy Court Requires Plaintiffs to Amend Complaints to Conform with Twombly and Iqbal Standards

By: Christopher A. Ward and Shanti M. Katona

 

In an order dated September 7, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Robert D. Drain of the Southern District of New York dismissed, without prejudice, more than 100 adversary proceedings filed by the reorganized debtors (the “Debtors”) in the bankruptcy cases of DPH Holdings Corp. (05-44481 (RDD)) (“Delphi”) for failure to plead sufficient facts to state such claims and to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Federal Rules”).

Heightened Pleading Standard under Twombly and Iqbal

Under Federal Rule 8(a)(2), a complaint must provide “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). In 2007, however, the United States Supreme Court elaborated on the requirements under Rule 8. In Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007), the Supreme Court replaced the traditional standard that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief as established in Conley v. Gibson, 78 S.Ct. 99 (1957). Instead, the Supreme Court held that a complaint asserting a violation of the Sherman Act must allege enough factual matter to make a complaint plausible on its face. Twombly at 127 S.Ct. 1965. The Court particularly stressed that while factual allegations need not be detailed, they require more than “labels and conclusions, and a formalistic recitation of the elements of a cause of action.” Id. at 1964-1965.

In 2009, the Supreme Court clarified that the Twombly pleading standard applies beyond the scope of antitrust issues and reiterated its applicability to all civil actions. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937 (2009).

To survive a motion to dismiss, a civil complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ A claim has facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. The plausibility standard is not akin to a ‘probability requirement,’ but asks for more than a sheer possibility that a defendant has acted unlawfully. Where a complaint pleads facts that are ‘merely consistent with’ a defendants liability, it ‘stops short of the line between possibility and plausibility of ‘entitlement to relief.’ ”

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009) (internal citations omitted). The Court also affirmed the Twombly two-pronged approach to deciding motions to dismiss: first, determine what is a factual allegation vis-à-vis a legal conclusion as only factual allegations will be accepted as true; and second, determine whether the factual allegations state a plausible claim for relief. Id., 129 S.Ct. at 1950-1951.

Conclusion

The Delphi decision confirms that the heightened pleading standards under Twombly and Iqbal will be applied in adversary proceedings pending in the Bankruptcy Court. However, at the end of the day, Judge Drain granted Delphi the opportunity to seek leave to amend the original complaints to adhere with this recent United States Supreme Court precedent.

What You Should Do Now

This development highlights litigation strategies frequently overlooked in the avoidance action litigation.

  • Plaintiffs need to be more diligent in pleading their causes of action; in particular, when such causes of action seek the avoidance of alleged preferential or fraudulent transfers.
  • Defendants need to be aware of this heightened scrutiny now being applied to pleadings in adversary proceedings and not ignore raising deficiencies when responding to an adversary complaint.

Although leave to amend may have been granted in Delphi, other courts may not be as lenient in granting such relief.

For More Information

For more information on this topic, please contact:


Polsinelli Shughart | In the News

Headlines and Bylines from polsinelli.com

 
To learn more about our RSS feeds, click here.

Polsinelli Shughart Adds Nationally Recognized Business Litigator Sean Gallagher to Denver Office

Colorado Governor Bill Ritter Names Polsinelli Shughart Attorney to Venture Capital Investment Roundtable

Polsinelli Shughart Attorney Kenneth Suelthaus Sworn in as a Missouri Highways and Transportation Commissioner

KMOX Radio Interviews Polsinelli Shughart Public Policy Attorney Martin Frost on the Upcoming November Election

Get more news from polsinelli.com.

Click here to learn more about our RSS feeds. Click here to learn more about our RSS feeds.
 

About Polsinelli Shughart PC

With more than 500 attorneys, Polsinelli Shughart PC is a national law firm that is a recognized leader in the areas of business litigation, financial services, bankruptcy, real estate, business law, construction, life sciences, environmental and natural resources, health care, insurance coverage/bad faith, and labor and employment. Serving corporate, institutional and individual clients regionally, nationally and worldwide, Polsinelli Shughart is known for successfully applying forward-thinking strategies for both straightforward and complex legal matters. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com.

 
 
With offices in:  Kansas City - St. Louis - Chicago - Denver - Phoenix - Washington, D.C. -  New York - Wilmington DE - Overland Park - St. Joseph - Springfield - Jefferson City - Topeka - Edwardsville

 

To update your email preferences, please contact Therese O'Shea. To opt out of these communications, click the unsubscribe link below.

Polsinelli Shughart PC provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Nothing herein should be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances, possible changes to applicable laws, rules and regulations and other legal issues. Receipt of this material does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

Polsinelli Shughart is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Polsinelli Shughart® is a registered trademark of Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 

Copyright 2010
 

Copyright © 2010 Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 
Polsinelli Shughart PC