Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli - Construction, Energy and Real Estate Litigation Construction, Energy and Real Estate Litigation
         

  

December 2014

  

Can You Discriminate Against a Company's Race? Fourth Circuit Says Yes, Grants Standing to Sue for Racial Discrimination

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

For more information about this alert, please contact:

  

Jeffrey D. Kleysteuber

Author

816.218.1279

jkleysteuber@polsinelli.com

  

Brian J. Zickefoose

Author

816.374.0585

bzickefoose@polsinelli.com

  

Construction, Energy and Real Estate Litigation Professionals:

  

Roy Bash

816.395.0633

rbash@polsinelli.com

  

G. Edgar James

816.395.0661

ejames@polsinelli.com

  

To view a full list of our Construction, Energy and Real Estate Litigation Professionals, click here.

  

To learn more about our Construction, Energy and Real Estate Litigation practice, click here.

  

  


View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Inside Law Podcast Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.

SUBSCRIBE

   

Owners, contractors and other recipients of federal funds be aware: when construction or other federally-funded contracts sour, not only can contracting parties file lawsuits claiming breach of contract, but if the contracting party is a minority-owned business, it may have a discrimination claim under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has concluded that a minority-owned corporation may have a racial identity and standing to bring race discrimination claims.

Applying labels such as "race, color, or national origin" to business entities forges a new path in the area of employment and contract law. Now, not only must parties involved in federally-funded projects be concerned with discriminatory behavior toward employees, but also toward contracted parties. Understanding the employment implications of the Fourth Circuit's decision when entering into a contract with a minority-owned business, may shape the future of contract language, as well as contracting party relationships.

Title VI of the Civil Rights Act provides in part that "no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied any benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance" (emphasis added). Presumably, one would not consider a corporate entity – something lacking "race, color, or national origin" – to be a "person" within the meaning of the statute. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, however, recently held otherwise, concluding that a minority-owned corporation may establish an "imputed racial identity" for purposes of demonstrating standing to bring a claim of race discrimination under federal law.

In Carnell Construction Corp. v. Danville Redevelopment & Housing Authority, a civil contractor certified under state law as a "Small, Women- and Minority-Owned Business" was awarded a site work contract in connection with a federally funded housing project. The contractor's and owner's relationship quickly deteriorated after work began on the project. The owner chose not to allow the contractor to continue its work beyond the scheduled completion date and declared a default under the contractor's performance bond. In turn, the contractor filed a lawsuit against the owner based on race discrimination and breach of contract. The claims resulted in protracted litigation and three trials ensued. After the final trial, both parties appealed various issues. The court ultimately found that the trial court had committed reversible error on an evidentiary issue and remanded the case for a new trial on the contractor's race discrimination claims.

For More Information

As the new race discrimination trial progresses, employment attorneys and industry professionals will monitor the case for further implications. In the meantime, should you or your organization have questions or concerns about potential business discriminatory actions, please contact Brian Zickefoose in Labor & Employment, Jeffrey Kleysteuber in Construction, Energy and Real Estate Litigation, or your Polsinelli attorney.

 
 

  

     

  

 

 

  

     

  

 
 

Atlanta  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Edwardsville  Jefferson City  Kansas City  Los Angeles  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Springfield  Topeka  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington
polsinelli.com

 
             
 

  

ABOUT POLSINELLI

real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is a first generation Am Law 100 firm serving corporations, institutions, entrepreneurs and individuals nationally. Our attorneys successfully build enduring client relationships by providing practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and with a passion for assisting General Counsel and CEOs in achieving their objectives. Polsinelli is ranked 18th in number of U.S. partners* and has more than 740 attorneys in 19 offices. Profiled by The American Lawyer and ranked as the fastest growing U.S. law firm over a six-year period**, the firm focuses on healthcare, financial services, real estate, life sciences and technology, energy and business litigation, and has depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com. Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* Law360, March 2014
** The American Lawyer 2013 and 2014 reports

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2014 Polsinelli PC.

 
             
Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Polsinelli