Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli - Financial and Fiduciary Litigation Polsinelli - Financial and Fiduciary Litigation


April 2016


Delaware Supreme Court:
No General Jurisdiction Over Non-Delaware Businesses Simply by Virtue of Registering to Do Business in Delaware







For more information about this alert, please contact:


Christopher M. Coggins



Email | Bio


R. Montgomery Donaldson



Email | Bio



To learn more about our Financial and Fiduciary practice, to contact one of our Financial and Fiduciary attorneys, or for more Financial and Fiduciary Intelligence, click here.


View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Polsinelli Podcast Connect with us on Facebook.



Merely registering to do business in Delaware does not subject a non-Delaware company to the general jurisdiction of Delaware courts.

In Genuine Parts Company v. Cepec1, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo E. Strine, Jr. writing for the majority reconciled Delaware law to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman.2 The Chief Justice framed the issue on appeal as “whether Delaware may exercise general jurisdiction over a foreign corporation for claims having nothing to do with Delaware, as a price for the corporation agreeing simply to be able to do business in Delaware.”3 The Court held that in today’s world of national and international trade, registering and doing business in Delaware cannot equate to consenting to “personal jurisdiction in any cause of action, however unrelated to the foreign corporation‘s activities in Delaware.”4

A foreign corporation still can be subject to specific jurisdiction in Delaware under Delaware’s long-arm statute, but not Delaware’s registration statutes. Delaware’s registration statutes, which make no explicit reference to personal jurisdiction, “must [only] be read as a requirement that a foreign corporation must appoint a registered agent to accept service of process.”5 Because registration under these statutes no longer can be deemed consent to personal jurisdiction under Genuine Parts, exercising personal jurisdiction over a registered foreign corporation must be consistent with due process under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Chief Justice Strine observed that in the wake of both Daimler and Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown6, it is inconsistent with principles of due process to exercise general jurisdiction over a foreign corporation that is not essentially at home in a state for claims having no rational connection to the state.

While foreign corporations often take affirmative measures (be they successful or not) to have disputes litigated in the courts of Delaware, those that do not seek venue there can take comfort in the certainty that they will not be subjected to general jurisdiction in Delaware merely by virtue of their registering to do business there.

For More Information

For questions regarding this information, please contact one of the authors, a member of Polsinelli’s Financial and Fiduciary Litigation practice, or your Polsinelli attorney.



1 2016 WL 1569077 (Del. 2016).
2 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014).
3 Genuine Parts, 2016 WL 1569077, at * 1.
4 Id. at *2.
5 Id.
6 131 S. Ct. 2846 (2011). [ 131 S.Ct. 2846 (2011).











Atlanta  Boston  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Houston  Kansas City  Los Angeles  Nashville  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  Raleigh  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington








real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is an Am Law 100 firm with more than 800 attorneys in 19 offices, serving corporations, institutions, and entrepreneurs nationally. Ranked in the top five percent of law firms for client service*, the firm has risen more than 100 spots in Am Law's annual firm ranking over the past six years. Polsinelli attorneys provide practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and focus on health care, financial services, real estate, intellectual property, mid-market corporate, and business litigation. Polsinelli attorneys have depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* 2016 BTI Client Service A-Team Report







Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Polsinelli is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2016 Polsinelli PC.

Polsinelli Polsinelli - Financial and Fiduciary Litigation Polsinelli - Financial and Fiduciary Litigation