Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli Commercial Litigation


June 2016


Texas Court of Appeals: Parties Cannot Recover Statutory Attorney's Fees from an LLC for Breach of Contract Claims







For more information about this e-Alert, please contact:


Daniel D. McGuire



Email | Bio



To learn more about our Commercial Litigation practice, to contact one of our Commercial Litigation attorneys, or for more Commercial Litigation Intelligence, click here.



Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.

View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  


LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Polsinelli Podcast

A recent decision from the Texas Court of Appeals in Houston closes the door to the recovery of attorney's fees from limited liability companies (LLCs) under Chapter 38 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, one of the few statutes authorizing the recovery of attorney's fees in litigation disputes.

This holding will have a significant impact on plaintiffs and defendants currently in litigation, or contemplating litigation, in Texas. Indeed, the prospect of recovering attorney's fees for plaintiffs, and the potential liability for the opposing side's attorney's fees for defendants, has played a central role in the decision-making process about whether, and how, to litigate breach of contract claims in Texas. Those considerations must now change if the dispute involves an LLC, partnership, association or legal entity that is not a corporation.

Like many other states, Texas follows the "American Rule" by "prohibiting fee awards unless specifically provided by contract or statute."1 Section 38.001 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that a "person may recover reasonable attorney's fees from an individual or corporation, in addition to the amount of a valid claim and costs, if the claim is for ... an oral or written contract."2 This statute has long served as the primary basis for recovering attorney's fees in breach of contract disputes.3

The Houston Court of Appeals, in Alta Mesa Holdings, L.P. v. Ives, held that the plaintiffs could not recover attorney's fees against an LLC under § 38.001 because an LLC is not an "individual or corporation" under § 38.001.4 In reaching this conclusion, the court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that LLCs and corporations often receive the same treatment under both Texas law and Delaware law (the state of the LLC's formation). Although the court acknowledged the often-synonymous nature of the words "company" and "corporation," it nevertheless held that, under Texas law, "the legal entities identified by the terms 'corporation' and 'limited liability company' are distinct entities with some but not all of the same features."5

The court's holding in Alta Mesa followed the reasoning of its own recent decision and a 1997 Texas federal court decision holding that attorney's fees could not be recovered against other legal entities that were not "corporations" under § 38.001.6 The plaintiffs in Alta Mesa have filed a motion to extend the deadline to file a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court.

This holding, if upheld on appeal, will have a significant impact on both plaintiffs and defendants currently in litigation, or contemplating litigation, in Texas.

Although there are other, more narrow statutory grounds that may still be asserted to recover attorney's fees under Texas law, parties in breach of contract disputes in Texas must be aware of this sizeable shift in the law that will undeniably alter their dispute-resolution strategies.

For More Information

For questions regarding this information, please contact Dan McGuire, a member of Polsinelli's Commercial Litigation practice, or your Polsinelli attorney.



1 MBM Fin. v. Woodlands Operating Co., 292 S.W.3d 660, 669 (Tex. 2009).
2 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 38.001(8).
3 This statute was passed by the Texas Legislature in 1985.
4 --- S.W.3d ----, 2016 WL 1534007, at *11-13 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.], motion for extension of time to file petition granted, May 24, 2016)
5 Id. at *12.
6 Fleming & Associates, L.L.P. v. Barton, 425 S.W.3d 560, 574-76 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2014, pet. denied) (plaintiff could not recover attorney's fees from limited liability partnership); Ganz v. Lyons P'ship, L.P., 173 F.R.D. 173, 176 (N.D. Tex. 1997) (holding that § 38.001(8) did not authorize recovery of attorney's fees against limited partnership).











Atlanta  Boston  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Houston  Kansas City  Los Angeles  Nashville  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  Raleigh  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington








real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is an Am Law 100 firm with more than 800 attorneys in 19 offices, serving corporations, institutions, and entrepreneurs nationally. Ranked in the top five percent of law firms for client service*, the firm has risen more than 50 spots over the past five years in the Am Law 100 annual law firm ranking. Polsinelli attorneys provide practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and focus on health care, financial services, real estate, intellectual property, mid-market corporate, and business litigation. Polsinelli attorneys have depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* 2016 BTI Client Service A-Team Report







Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Polsinelli is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2016 Polsinelli PC.

Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Polsinelli Commercial Litigation Polsinelli Commercial Litigation