Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli Polsinelli - Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation

June 2015


Supreme Court Reminds Companies to Monitor 401(k) Plan Investments, Sets Parameters for "Regular Review" Requirements


For more information about this alert, please contact:


Hannah R. DeLuca


Email | Bio


Meredith A. VanderWilt


Email | Bio


Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Leaders:


W. Andrew Douglass

Practice Area Chair


Email | Bio


William P. Sweeney

Practice Area Vice Chair


Email | Bio



To view a full list of our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation professionals, click here.


For current Intelligence or to learn more about our Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice, click here.


To follow Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation on Twitter, click here.


View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  


LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Polsinelli Podcast Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.



Companies and in-house fiduciaries face increasing scrutiny these days over their 401(k) and other retirement plans. This was underscored again recently by a key Supreme Court ruling. In Tibble v. Edison International, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employer's duty to monitor its 401(k) plan investment options does not end with the selection of the investments. Rather, employers have an ongoing fiduciary duty to have a "regular review" of their plans' investment funds to ensure that they continue to be appropriate.

Now more than ever, fiduciaries must take steps to ensure they are fulfilling their statutory duties when they select and review the assets in their companies' retirement plans. The Supreme Court's decision in Tibble comes on the heels of the U.S. Department of Labor's recent proposal of new fiduciary rules that would restrict investment advisors to ERISA-covered retirement plans (see prior analysis here). Going forward, we expect the DOL and other agencies, as well as reviewing courts, to be more active in examining alleged fiduciary breaches.

In Tibble, the Court examined the applicability of the general six-year statute of limitations period under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended ("ERISA"). In particular, the Court addressed whether a breach of fiduciary claim in which the initial investment occurred more than six years ago was time-barred. The Court held that the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations, because the appellate court only considered the claim with respect to the initial choice of investment. Applying trust law principles, the Supreme Court stated that plan fiduciaries have an ongoing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, and that the lower court should have considered such a duty in its ruling. The Supreme Court held that the claim was timely if the alleged fiduciary breach of the ongoing duty to monitor happened within the applicable six-year period. Consequently, the case was remanded back to the Ninth Circuit for additional proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling.

For More Information

Please contact the authors or any member of Polsinelli's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice group should you have any concerns regarding the possible impact of the Supreme Court's ruling on your company's fiduciary governance and review procedures.



Atlanta  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Kansas City  Los Angeles  Nashville  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  Raleigh  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Springfield  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington



real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is an Am Law 100 firm with more than 750 attorneys in 18 offices, serving corporations, institutions, entrepreneurs and individuals nationally. Ranked in the top five percent of law firms for client service and top five percent of firms for innovating new and valuable services*, the firm has risen more than 100 spots in Am Law's annual firm ranking over the past six years. Polsinelli attorneys provide practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and focus on health care, financial services, real estate, life sciences and technology, and business litigation. Polsinelli attorneys have depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* BTI Client Service A-Team 2015 and BTI Brand Elite 2015


Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2015 Polsinelli PC.

Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Polsinelli- Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Polsinelli Polsinelli