Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli - Environmental and Natural Resources Polsinelli - Environmental
         

  

October 2014

  

California's Eastern District: Government Agency Liable for Costs When Site Cleanup Is Mismanaged

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 
 

For more information on this alert, please contact:

  

Allison A. Schaper

Author

314.889.7068

aschaper@polsinelli.com

  

Troy B. Froderman

Practice Area Chair

602.650.2300

tfroderman@polsinelli.com

  

Christopher E. Erker

Practice Area Vice Chair

314.622.6679

cerker@polsinelli.com

  

  

Learn more about our Environmental Professionals, click here.

  

Learn more about our Environmental practice, click here.

  

  


View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Inside Law Podcast

SUBSCRIBE

 

   

  

In a ruling last month (California Department of Toxic Substances Control v. Jim Dobbas, Inc., et al), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California held that the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) was an "operator" under CERCLA Section 107(a)(2), and thus may be held liable for costs surrounding a botched site cleanup.

This ruling means those private parties whose liability under CERCLA arises from sites where government agencies have taken an "operator" role may be able to obtain contribution or cost recovery from that government agency. However, that agency must have demonstrated inadequate or mismanaged remediation efforts.

The site is a former wood preservation operation located in Elmira, California. Amongst others, DTSC's actions over the last 30 years included efforts to repair and restart the groundwater extraction and treatment system, completion of a remedial investigation for site soils, preparation of the Removal Action Workplan in October and November 2011, and groundwater monitoring.

DTSC brought an action under CERCLA to recover clean-up costs from Dobbas and others. Dobbas counterclaimed that DTSC mismanaged the cleanup efforts and sought contribution and cost recovery from DTSC pursuant to §§ 9607 and 9613. Plaintiff moved to dismiss and strike portions of Dobbas's Answer. DTSC argued it is not an operator under CERCLA and further, it enjoys sovereign immunity due to its government agency status.

According to the court, DTSC's actions in directing site clean-up formed sufficient grounds for denying its motion to dismiss the counterclaim. Quoting United States v. Bestfoods, the Eastern District stated "an operator must manage, direct, or conduct operations specifically related to pollution, that is, operations having to do with the leakage or disposal of hazardous waste, or decisions about compliance with environmental regulations." Courts had previously used a narrower standard when deciding if an entity had exhibited control over a site. However, when DTSC relied upon these decisions, the Eastern District pointed out that these decisions were prior to the Bestfoods decision. As to DTSC's immunity assertion, the Ninth Circuit has previously clarified that CERCLA includes a waiver of sovereign immunity. Therefore, Dobbas' counterclaim survived.

For More Information

It is important to keep in mind that this decision is not the final word on the issue, and it is likely the Ninth Circuit will see an appeal. This case will continue to be monitored in order to keep you informed. For more information on how this ruling might impact your business concerns, please contact your Polsinelli attorney or the author of this alert:

  

 
 

  

     

  

 

 

  

     

  

 
 

Atlanta  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Edwardsville  Jefferson City  Kansas City  Los Angeles  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Springfield  Topeka  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington
polsinelli.com

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

  

ABOUT POLSINELLI

real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is a first generation Am Law 100 firm serving corporations, institutions, entrepreneurs and individuals nationally. Our attorneys successfully build enduring client relationships by providing practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and with a passion for assisting General Counsel and CEOs in achieving their objectives. Polsinelli is ranked 18th in number of U.S. partners* and has more than 740 attorneys in 19 offices. Profiled by The American Lawyer and ranked as the fastest growing U.S. law firm over a six-year period**, the firm focuses on healthcare, financial services, real estate, life sciences and technology, energy and business litigation, and has depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com. Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* Law360, March 2014
** The American Lawyer 2013 and 2014 reports

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2014 Polsinelli PC.

 
             
Polsinelli