Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli - Health Care Polsinelli - Health Care
         

  

March 2016

  

Most States Delayed in Implementing Long-Term Care Background Check Program, OIG Finds

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 
Best Lawyers - Law Firm of the Year - U.S. News and World Report - Health Care Law - 2015

  

Modern Healthcare - by the numbers 2015 - No. 1 Polsinelli - Largest healthcare law firms

  

For more information about this e-Alert, please contact:

  

Jason T. Lundy

312.873.3604

Email | Bio

  

Mark D. Nelson

312.463.6371

Email | Bio

  

Scott M. Gilbert

312.463.6375

Email | Bio

  

  

To learn more about our Health Care practice, to contact one of our Health Care attorneys, or for more Health Care Intelligence, click here.

  


View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  

SUBSCRIBE

LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Polsinelli Podcast Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.
   

The Office of Inspector General’s (OIG’s) recent report found significant delays in states’ implementation of a background check program for long-term care employees. Because the interplay between Ban the Box laws and long-term care background checks can be complex, health care providers should keep a close eye on their states’ progress to ensure compliance once fully implemented.

Established by the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the background check program provides as much as $160 million in federal funds for states that voluntarily implement the program.

However, the report found that out of the 25 participating states:

  • Only six states have submitted sufficient data in order to calculate percentage of prospective employees disqualified because of background checks.
  • In the six states that participated, 3 percent of prospective employees were disqualified from employment because of background checks.
  • Of the remaining 19 states, 11 states had not yet submitted data reports. Eight of these states had gaps that prevented calculation of disqualification rates.
  • Thirteen states were still in the process of obtaining legislation to enable background checks.
  • Ten states did not yet have the ability to collect fingerprints.

The stringent requirements of the program may be a cause of the implementation delays. The program requires states to include three types of background checks in their processes:

  1. Search of state-based abuse and neglect registries and databases
  2. Check of state criminal history records
  3. Fingerprint-based check of FBI criminal history records

OIG recommended that CMS should continue working with states to fully implement these programs, and to improve the required reporting.

Another potential cause for delay is that the program may conflict with recent trends in state legislation that require employers to postpone background checks until later in the hiring process. These so-called “ban the box” laws do not prohibit employers from utilizing background checks generally, but delay the time in which an employer is allowed to inquire into an applicant’s background.

Recently, several states have extended these requirements to private employers. In addition, while some jurisdictions exclude health care providers from complying with the laws, others make no such exception. States that have adopted Ban the Box Laws and have not yet submitted data reports or did not submit sufficient data include:

  • California
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Georgia
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Minnesota
  • Ohio
  • Oregon
  • Rhode Island

To avoid future compliance issues, health care providers, particularly those in the states listed above, should keep abreast of their states’ progress in implementing these long-term care background checks programs.

For More Information

For questions regarding the content of this alert, please contact the authors.

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
         

 

 

 

  

     

  

 
 

Atlanta  Boston  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Houston  Kansas City  Los Angeles  Nashville  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  Raleigh  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington
polsinelli.com

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

  

ABOUT POLSINELLI

real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is an Am Law 100 firm with more than 775 attorneys in 19 offices, serving corporations, institutions, entrepreneurs and individuals nationally. Ranked in the top five percent of law firms for client service*, the firm has risen more than 100 spots in Am Law's annual firm ranking over the past six years. Polsinelli attorneys provide practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and focus on health care and life sciences, financial services, real estate, technology and biotech, mid-market corporate, and business litigation. Polsinelli attorneys have depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com. Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* 2016 BTI Client Service A-Team Report

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Polsinelli is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2016 Polsinelli PC.

 
             
Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Polsinelli Health Care Health Care