Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli Intellectual Property & Technology
         

  

March 2015

  

FCC's Decision on Net Neutrality Likely to Lead to Litigation

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

For more information about this alert, please contact:

  

Maggie M. Arcaro

Author

303.583.8275

Email | Bio

  

Michael P. Dulin

Author

303.583.8239

Email | Bio

  

Additional Intellectual Property Practice Leadership:

  

Patrick C. Woolley

Practice Area Chair

816.360.4280

Email | Bio

  

Gregory P. Durbin

Practice Area Vice Chair

720.931.8133

Email | Bio

  

Kathryn J. Doty

Practice Area Vice Chair

314.552.6850

Email | Bio

  

  

To view a full list of our Intellectual Property professionals, click here.

  

For current Intelligence or to learn more about our Intellectual Property practice, click here.

  


View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Inside Law Podcast Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.

 

   

In a historic 3-2 vote on Thursday, February 26th, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to approve net neutrality rules aimed at governing Internet traffic. The FCC's decision would expand government oversight for Internet service by treating it as a "public utility" or "common carrier service" under Title II of the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Historically, only fixed broadband services (i.e., cable and telephone) have been regulated under Title II. This new regulation will require Internet service providers (ISPs) to treat all Internet traffic equally, meaning they will be prohibited from activities such as charging "prioritization" fees to certain websites demanding faster download speeds, or blocking or degrading certain users' Internet access.

Several major telecom companies, including AT&T, Comcast, T-Mobile, and Verizon are expected to challenge the FCC's decision on the grounds that it lacks the authority over ISPs. Following Thursday's ruling, Comcast's executive vice president, David Cohen, warned that litigation was inevitable and that Comcast may consider canceling plans to develop its own broadband network in light of the increased regulation. AT&T and Verizon have previously issued warnings that they would challenge any action by the FCC to enact Title II against ISPs.

Telecom companies are joined in opposition to the ruling by members of the Republican Party, who believe increased government regulation of the Internet will discourage investment in Internet-related business. Opponents of net neutrality argue that a government-mandated equal playing field will result in both higher rates being charged to consumers as well as slower broadband speeds overall.

The FCC's action has been driven at least in part by the dramatic increase in consumer demand for video and content streaming services provided via the Internet. Services such as Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime Instant require fast download speeds in order to provide video content to their subscribers, and competition among these streaming services is fierce. Technical issues such as freezing, rebuffering or poor video quality may lead to a loss of subscribers. As streaming services continue to demand faster and faster download speeds, ISPs have resorted to implementing measures such as data caps and priority pricing. These types of measures would be prohibited under Title II, which would require all Internet traffic to be treated equally.

In addition to the threat of impending litigation, the FCC is also facing three congressional investigations aimed at determining whether the White House improperly influenced the decision-making of FCC Chairman Thomas Wheeler. The details of the FCC's ruling will remain unknown until the order is published in the Federal Register, which could take weeks. Until then, the telecom giants will be watched closely for signs of impending litigation.

For More Information

For more information on evaluating and maintaining your trademark portfolio, please contact the author or a member of Polsinelli's Intellectual Property practice.

 
 

  

     

  

 
         

 

 

 

  

     

  

 
 

Atlanta  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Edwardsville  Jefferson City  Kansas City  Los Angeles  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Springfield  Topeka  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington
polsinelli.com

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

  

ABOUT POLSINELLI

real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is a first generation Am Law 100 firm serving corporations, institutions, entrepreneurs and individuals nationally. Our attorneys successfully build enduring client relationships by providing practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and with a passion for assisting General Counsel and CEOs in achieving their objectives. Polsinelli is ranked 18th in number of U.S. partners* and has more than 740 attorneys in 19 offices. Profiled by The American Lawyer and ranked as the fastest growing U.S. law firm over a six-year period**, the firm focuses on health care, financial services, real estate, life sciences and technology, energy and business litigation, and has depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com. Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* Law360, March 2014
** The American Lawyer 2013 and 2014 reports

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2015 Polsinelli PC.

 
             
Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Intellectual Property Polsinelli Intellectual Property Polsinelli