Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Intellectual Property Intellectual Property
         

  

March 2017

  

Supreme Court Decision
Alters Patent Defense Landscape

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

For more information about this alert, please contact:

  

Todd A. Davidovits

314.889.7076

Email | Bio

  

Keith J. Grady

314.552.6883

Email | Bio

  

Gary E. Hood

312.873.3653

Email | Bio

  

To learn more about our Intellectual Property practice, to contact one of our attorneys, or for more Intellectual Property Intelligence, click here.

  


Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  

SUBSCRIBE

  

LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Polsinelli Podcast Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.
   

In a highly-anticipated ruling, the Supreme Court held that patent holders can recover damages for infringement even when the patent holders unreasonably delayed filing a lawsuit.  In SCA Hygiene Products AB v. First Quality Baby Products LLC, the Supreme Court eliminated laches as a defense to claims for damages in patent cases.  Laches prevents a party from suing after an unreasonable delay. 

The Patent Act, which governs patent infringement cases, limits a patent owner's right to recover damages for infringement to the six-year period that precedes the filing of a complaint.  In a 2014 decision, Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., the Supreme Court held that a similar provision in the Copyright Act that set a three-year statute of limitations eliminated the laches defense.  The Court explained that where Congress explicitly sets a statute of limitations, this implicitly means that a rights holder can collect damages within the statute of limitations.  Essentially, Congress eliminated laches as a defense to a claim for damages within the statute of limitations.  In the ruling, which occurred Tuesday, March 21, the Supreme Court adopted this interpretation for patent cases.

This decision eliminates a defense that accused infringers frequently assert and gives patent owners the right to collect damages for infringement that occurred within six-years of filing a complaint.  Laches remains a defense to equitable relief. Please contact Polsinelli attorneys to discuss how this decision impacts your ability to protect your valuable intellectual property.   

For More Information

For more information on this ruling or how it may impact your business, please contact one of the authors, a member of Polsinelli's Intellectual Property practice, or your Polsinelli attorney.

 
 

  

     

  

 
         

 

 

 

  

     

  

 
 

Atlanta  Boston  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Houston  Kansas City  Los Angeles  Nashville  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  Raleigh  San Francisco  Silicon Valley  St. Joseph  St. Louis  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington
polsinelli.com

   
 

  

     

  

 
 

  

ABOUT POLSINELLI

real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is an Am Law 100 firm with approximately 800 attorneys in 20 offices, serving corporations, institutions, and entrepreneurs nationally. Ranked #17 for Client Service Excellence among 650 U.S. law firms, Polsinelli has risen more than 50 spots over the past five years in the Am Law 100 annual law firm ranking. Polsinelli attorneys provide practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and focus on health care, financial services, real estate, intellectual property, mid-market corporate, labor and employment, and business litigation. Polsinelli attorneys have depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com. Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* 2017 BTI Client Service A-Team Report

  

 
 

  

     

  

 
 

Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Polsinelli is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2017 Polsinelli PC.

 
             
Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Intellectual Property Polsinelli Polsinelli Intellectual Property