Share this e-Alert:

Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Intellectual Property Intellectual Property


July 2016


Brexit Prompts IP Uncertainty







For more information about this alert, please contact:


Melvin J. Sims


Email | Bio


Matthew J. Smith


Email | Bio


To learn more about our Intellectual Property practice, to contact one of our Intellectual Property attorneys, or for more Intellectual Property Intelligence, click here.




Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli Polsinelli View Polsinelli documents on JD Supra  



LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Polsinelli Podcast Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook.

It's difficult to turn on the news and not hear something about the historic vote by Britain to leave the European Union. While the Brexit vote already has had an immediate effect on global economic markets, the legal effects in the intellectual property arena will likely take a bit longer to understand given that Britain's EU exit will take place over the next several years.

Given this uncertainty, in anticipation of potential changes to existing trademark registrations, pending trademark applications and patent rights in the European Union, U.S. companies should proactively evaluate their current foreign trademark portfolios and patent rights now to plan for proper protection of their brands in the UK and the EU.

What Will Trademarks Look Like Post-Brexit?

Trademark uncertainty arises because Community Trade Marks were created by Council Regulation, and the regulation in its current form does not say a word about what happens when a Member State leaves the EU. Recall that the main benefit of a CTM registration is that a trademark owner obtains protection in all EU Member States rather than having to file in each separate country. As a consequence of the Brexit vote, EU trademarks will no longer be recognized in the UK after exit, and there is much debate about the effect of current CTM registrations post-exit. 

Currently, the UK remains part of the EU; the Brexit vote was an advisory referendum to say that the country should leave the Union – it is now up to the British Government to give effect to that decision. It is likely to take at least two years for the UK to formally exit the EU, although some commentators believe that it will take far longer than that and some campaigners are pushing for the exit to be more quickly completed. We really cannot say how long the exit negotiations will take, with any certainty, or what the ultimate effect of those negotiations will have on trademark protection or enforcement. We also don't know if the UK may elect to divorce itself entirely from the EU, or remain closely integrated with the EU and would become members of the European Economic Area (EEA) and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) to retain some benefits of a single market.

In a post-Brexit world, we advise our clients with existing EU trademarks to review their current foreign trademark portfolios, specifically CTM registrations, to evaluate whether to take immediate steps to secure trademark protection in the UK in combination with CTM registrations as a hedge against the uncertainty of Britain leaving the EU. Given that trademark registrations take on average 12 to18 months from filing to registration, it's better to start the process sooner rather than later or rely on the UK-EU negotiations to provide adequate trademark protection for pre-Brexit CTM trademarks either through a nationalization process (converting a CTM registration into a CTM registration plus a UK registration) or by extending coverage in the UK by treaty. We also recommend that our clients commence filing separate UK national trademark applications as well as CTM applications for future marks because the result of the exit negotiations and their effect on trademark registrations or enforcement proceedings will not be known for several years. 

European Patents: What's Next?

Short-term, the exit will have little to no effect on patents. The UK is a signatory to the European Patent Convention of 1973. As such, its patent system is governed by the European Patent Office (EPO). The EPC is a treaty separate from the EU. Indeed, countries such as Albania, Norway and Switzerland are not members of the EU, but are member states of the EPO. Similarly, it is anticipated that the UK will remain a member state of the EPO, and UK patents and process will still be governed by the EPC.

That said, the EU was expected to launch the so-called Unitary European patent system and a Unified Patent Court (UPC) to resolve issues related to the Unitary Patent. Under this new unitary patent system, a single EU patent would issue from the EPO, offering patent protection throughout the entire EU. This contrasts with the current EPO system, under which the EPO performs a centralized examination and then returns the application to the individual national patent offices, which then issue their own national patent, conferring their respective bundles of patent rights. It was anticipated that the EPC would receive sufficient ratification signatures to come into effect sometime in 2017.

However, the terms of the EPC agreement require UK ratification of the agreement in order to come into effect. If the UK is outside of the EU, it is reasonably anticipated that that launch of the Unitary Patent and the UPC may be delayed. We are waiting to hear from the respective EPC negotiators what specific effect the formal withdrawal will have. For example, the agreement may be altered to remove the requirement of the UK accession, and proceed with another country as one of the three required signatories. Alternatively, and depending on how other bi and multilateral negotiations progress, it is also possible that the UK might be permitted to join the unitary patent system without being a member of the EU. Accordingly, due to the uncertain future of the unitary patent system, clients planning to take advantage of that system should reevaluate their future filing strategies.

Enforcement Questions Loom

Currently, European patents are enforced on an individual country basis. In the wake of the Brexit vote, infringement of European patents will continue to be litigated in each relevant national court. Accordingly, the Brexit is not likely to significantly change how patents are enforced at present. Similarly, certain trans-national remedies, such as cross-border injunctive relief, which were not available under the European Patent Convention, will very likely continue to not be available. Conversely, unless and until the UPC comes into effect, concerns which were raised about potential forum shopping within the EU or the possibility of a small country's UPC court invalidating a patent throughout the whole of Europe are now moot.

For More Information

Polsinelli has an experienced team of IP professionals that can assist you in evaluating your European IP strategies in light of these events and can keep you informed of any new developments which may affect you or your client's rights. For more information on the impact of Brexit on your patent rights and filing strategies as well as trademark applications and registrations, please contact the author or your Polsinelli attorney.

Polsinelli has an experienced team of trademark professionals that can assist you in evaluating your current trademark portfolios and charting a post-Brexit trademark and branding course in the future.  For more information on this ruling or how it may impact your business, please contact the author or your Polsinelli attorney.













Atlanta  Boston  Chattanooga  Chicago  Dallas  Denver  Houston  Kansas City  Los Angeles  Nashville  New York
Overland Park  Phoenix  Raleigh  St. Joseph  St. Louis  San Francisco  Washington, D.C.  Wilmington








real challenges. real answers.SM  
Polsinelli is an Am Law 100 firm with more than 800 attorneys in 19 offices, serving corporations, institutions, and entrepreneurs nationally. Ranked in the top five percent of law firms for client service*, the firm has risen more than 50 spots over the past five years in the Am Law 100 annual law firm ranking. Polsinelli attorneys provide practical legal counsel infused with business insight, and focus on health care, financial services, real estate, intellectual property, mid-market corporate, and business litigation. Polsinelli attorneys have depth of experience in 100 service areas and 70 industries. The firm can be found online at Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP.

* 2016 BTI Client Service A-Team Report







Polsinelli provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Polsinelli is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Copyright © 2016 Polsinelli PC.

Connect with us on LinkedIn. Connection with us on Twitter. Connect with us on Facebook. Intellectual Property Polsinelli Polsinelli Intellectual Property